Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 23:46:36 GMT -5
Thus, one of the measures that, as specialists in administrative law and the public service specifically, we propose as necessary, would be to establish in the calls for selective processes, that the registered sex will be taken into account when it is published and not the change later, which would make it difficult for the assumption we have discussed to occur.
Also in the calls for such processes, it has been proposed to reserve a place for trans people, as is already done for disabled people, although this raises, from our point of view, obvious problems of inequality , so the Administration must justify the different treatment of the norm in this case.
For example, with regard to people with Fax Lists disabilities , the reservation of the quota is justified because they have greater difficulties than other citizens in accessing the labor market, and they face both physical and intellectual obstacles, making it difficult for them to fully integrate. In the laboral world.
In the case of trans people, regulations in this regard already exist in some autonomies. This is the case of the Aragonese Trans Law , which includes as a measure reserving at least 1% of the public employment places offered for said group.
Now, as jurists we ask ourselves the following question: Should equality prevail in access to public employment, as enshrined in articles 23 and 103 of our Constitution, or should diversity prevail?
If we establish a quota for trans people, why not do it for other minority and discriminated groups? What we as citizens must demand from the Administration and those who serve in it (public officials) is not a special sensitivity due to their personal circumstances or those promoted by social or political pressure, but rather that they act objectively and subject to the law and the law. .
Also in the calls for such processes, it has been proposed to reserve a place for trans people, as is already done for disabled people, although this raises, from our point of view, obvious problems of inequality , so the Administration must justify the different treatment of the norm in this case.
For example, with regard to people with Fax Lists disabilities , the reservation of the quota is justified because they have greater difficulties than other citizens in accessing the labor market, and they face both physical and intellectual obstacles, making it difficult for them to fully integrate. In the laboral world.
In the case of trans people, regulations in this regard already exist in some autonomies. This is the case of the Aragonese Trans Law , which includes as a measure reserving at least 1% of the public employment places offered for said group.
Now, as jurists we ask ourselves the following question: Should equality prevail in access to public employment, as enshrined in articles 23 and 103 of our Constitution, or should diversity prevail?
If we establish a quota for trans people, why not do it for other minority and discriminated groups? What we as citizens must demand from the Administration and those who serve in it (public officials) is not a special sensitivity due to their personal circumstances or those promoted by social or political pressure, but rather that they act objectively and subject to the law and the law. .